Elliotte Friedman of Sportsnet, during an appearance on Sirius XM NHL Network Radio with Gord Stellick and Scott Laughlin, addressed the diminishing perceived value of draft picks in trades. Friedman posed the question of whether the specific conditions attached to these picks should be made public right away.
Gord Stellick initiated the discussion by noting a trend among teams to undervalue late first-round picks, readily including them in trade deadline deals. He pondered if general managers would begin to reassess this approach, perhaps revisiting the practice of including protections like top-5 or top-10 exclusions, especially after situations where expected playoff berths didn’t materialize. Stellick questioned if recent trade complexities would lead GMs to exercise greater caution moving forward.
Friedman responded that this trend would likely push teams to negotiate for more robust pick protections. He drew a parallel to the NBA, where significant tanking issues have led to discussions, albeit still brainstorming, about potential solutions such as limiting how often teams can trade first-round selections.
While Friedman believes much of this is self-policing by general managers—for instance, a team like Toronto accepting a certain risk to finalize a deal—he doesn’t feel the league needs to impose strict regulations. Instead, he emphasizes that each team must decide its own comfort level when engaging in a trade.
However, Friedman made a strong point regarding conditional picks: their terms must be explicitly clear from the outset. He expressed frustration with situations like the Florida-Chicago trade, where it took a full year for the public to learn that Florida’s pick was protected top-10. Friedman admitted his own annoyance at not realizing this sooner and highlighted that official releases from both the Blackhawks and Panthers at the time of the trade contained no mention of such conditions. He firmly stated that all conditions on picks should be transparent at the time of the trade.
